🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that smartphones and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked parliament to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is given. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these services, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," said the parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Previously, momentum built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. An organization established by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering harmful platform posts contends that a strict age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to build tools that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, action is largely happening at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional use dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws demanding adult authorization for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Outside of these regions, further nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies adopt a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

As this international conversation continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are no longer prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.